A great thing or just another SmartWatch on the market? The authors of the tech blogs write since Tuesday night fingers to the bone on Apple’s clock. The net reactions at a glance.

“Engadget”: Author Joseph Volpe is not too thrilled by Apple’s Smart Watch: “Apple has unveiled a little lukewarm at best,” he says. The clock is prettier than the Smart Watches, it has already given, “and that’s probably the biggest innovation.” Even some of the functions shown Volpe holds for gimmicks: “the moon phases and positions of the planets can with the Apple Watch you watch […] Cheap tricks, of which customers have after a few weeks be enough..”

“The Register”: The Blog sees the clock as interesting gadget, but not as a product that revolutionized the market: The clock remains an “iPhone accessory,” says Shaun Nichols. “Although it has some of the arguments, the question of whether it really needs for a device that will cost as much (or more) than your own phone remains?” At the end accounted Nichols: “This is not to say that there is no place for the Apple Watch or that they will never succeed, but to the hardware prices fall, it is difficult to see more in the clock as a niche product.. ”

“Mashable”: Author Todd Aquarius has already decided not to buy Apple Watch. He had previously possessed no SmartWatch in his life, so why should he now a need? “You could worsen my life,” he writes, the concept SmartWatch it sounds like a “recipe for stress” when e-mails from friends and chefs can be delivered to the wrist immediately and constantly. Such a gadget will negate “the last bit of my concentration,” fears of the author – and in practice, “it will probably end up that I’m doing the damn thing broke.” If go to sports and fitness tracking, there are much cheaper gadgets.

“Ars Technica”: “What we really need to know about the Apple Watch, we can not know, unless she actually comes out: What can it and how it works,” writes Andrew Cunningham. “We would expect the Apple Watch will thereby gain traction alone, that it is an Apple product, the brand is strong enough and their range so large that a decent number of people will get a -. Regardless of what they can the real question is, then what can they do with it -., and the answer to this question will determine whether Apple will end up a success as iPhone and iPad, or a much smaller like the Apple TV “.

“Gizmodo” (USA): “.. It’s an incredible vision, but it is not ready to brag But that’s okay,” says Brian Barrett. “Apple still has months to get everything ready for the big show.” So far, it may be known primarily as the clock looks like and how it feels, “she is outwardly beautiful clean and very comfortable – I have reluctantly removed again from my wrist.”

“The Verge”: An article in the Techblogs revolves around the battery life. “If Apple in battery life, a significant breakthrough have succeeded, it would probably, that would have been talking about this on stage,” writes Dan Seifert therein. “Given the many functions shown and the various sensors that plug in the device, I would be surprised if Apple brings out from the clock more than a day battery life.”

In another article, Aaron Souppouris busy with the outside of the clock. “The Apple Watch is definitely not perfect”, it says, “watches with square design will undoubtedly make only a small part of the over one billion watches that are purchased every year.” Souppouris itself can be thought of only one out of 34 models to wear it. “But if the millions look exactly, then the Apple Watch has a chance to succeed.”