Mitt Romney Tax Return : Shares in Turkish telecommunication giant Turkcell
Washington / NationalTurk – Mike Romney has invested in Turkish Mobile Operator and telecommunication giants Turkcell, a release of his tax records for years 2010 and 2011 revealed, after he lost in the North Carolina primary to his rival Newt Gingrich.
The rich Americans work with off-shore banks, open bank accounts in Switzerland to exploit tax advantages are also revealed. The disclosure indicated that using such cunning financial ways Mitt Romney has lowered the tax rate he pays to 15 percent while average tax rate for Americans is at 35 percent. US President Barack Obama announced and repeated at his State of the Union 2012 speech that anyone making more than $1 million per year should pay no less than a 30 percent tax rate. This call from Barack Obama to increase taxes on the rich came hours after Mitt Romney, the multi-millionaire Republican presidential hopeful, released tax returns showing that he paid just 14 per cent on earnings of more than $21m.
Mitt Romney for President : No, thanks USA
Aside from Turkcell Mitt Romney has invested in institutions such as National Bank of Greece and Chinese Life Insurance Company, according to the tax records.
With a net worth estimated at $250 million Mitt Romney’s revenue for the last two years was $42,6 millions Mitt Romney’s tax return has revealed.
Turkcell is the first Turkish company to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)(TKC), where its shares have been traded since July 11, 2000 along with trading on the Istanbul Stock Exchange (IMKB).
[adrotate banner=”33″]
Two reasons, JR: A) After you watch ONE poicalitl satire show, you’re kind of full , and don’t really want another dose of the same. (There have been nights when both shows have ended up ( by virtue of covering the same story of the day ) basically doing variations of the same jokes (also true of the OTHER late-night shows, of course; it’s not plagarism, it’s just the nature of the game). B)THE DAILY SHOW’s only major timeslot competitor is Conan (who’s not a big draw these days, but does overlap with Stewart and Colbert’s SPECIFIC fanbase- indeed, O’Brien’s show does MUCH better in Canada, where it actually FOLLOWS their shows on the same network, and all three shows basically support each other). By contrast, Colbert goes directly up against not only the last half of O’Brien, but head-to-head with Letterman and Leno- both skew older, but there’s going to be some attrition. It’s possible Colbert would do better if he switched timeslots with Stewart but I tend to think his more conceptual humor needs the audience to be warmed up and in the mood to work best.It’s a matter of taste which you prefer, but I think Stewart’s straight-up here’s what stupid things politicians did today approach has a more mainstream appeal- indeed, it’s just a more specific, detailed descendant of the kind of monologues late-night hosts have been doing since Watergate made doing EXPLICITLY poicalitl jokes acceptable to mainstream audiences.